
WEEKLY MARKET COMMENTARY 03/10/03
Tim Mulholland
Economic Highlights
Day
CST Report
Expected
Last
Comment
Mon.
8:00a
St. Louis Feds Poole Housing
& Macro Economy OFHEO Conference Washington D.C.
N/A U.S.
to seek UN vote on March 17 mandate for Iraq.
Tue.
8:30a
Tsy Secretary Snow Economic Initiatives
Community Bankers Conf. Washington D.C.
9:00a Jan Wholesale
Inventories +.2%
+.8% Underlying trend still positive- but is build-up
voluntary?
Wed. 7:30a
Jan Merch. Trade
Deficit $43.5bn
$44.2bn Risk of better # - but still well above previous record of $40bn.
Thu. 7:30a
Feb Retail Sales
-.5%
-.9% Bad weather hurt both chain store sales
& auto sales.
Ex-Autos
Unch
+1.3% Higher Gas price and Food sales (stocking) offset overall
weakness.
7:30a Jobless Claims (3-08)
417k
430k Correction
expected after 3 straight sharp rises-trend has deteriorated.
7:30a Feb Import Price Index +1.0%
+1.5% Ex-Oil exp. +.1%
(risk is higher) vs. +.9% trend up-perhaps on weak $.
3:15p 1st
day of Triple Witch - The SPM should be lead contract month during open of pit
session today.
8:00p Fed Gov. Olson
Community Banking Chicago Fed Conference
Fri. 7:30a Feb
PPI
+.6%
+1.6% Risk is for
higher # - Energy led gains - YOY +3.3% vs. +2.8%
Ex-Food & Energy
+.1%
+.9% Risk
is lower # -weaker auto prices-YOY +.3% vs. +.5%.
7:30a QIV
Current Account Deficit $136bn
$127bn Risk may be closer to
$140bn - 5.3% of GDP is hardly transitory!
7:30a Jan
Business Inventories +.3%
+.6% Weak Sales
may cause further rise in I/S ratio from 1.37 to 1.39.
8:15a Feb Industrial
Production +.2%
+.7% Risk is neg. # - weak manufacturing, utilities
and ISM production.
Feb Capacity Utilization
75.7%
75.7% Like IP
risk is weaker # near 75.1 lowest since Dec 2001.
8:45a
Mar Prelim Michigan Sent. 78.0
79.9% War
concerns, higher Gas prices, weak equity market, & Eco data.
8:45a Fed Gov.
Bies Managing Risks Bankers Conference Ala.
Overview
Economic data is concentrated near the end of the week.
Treasury Secretary Snow speaks Tuesday and, following his comments last week regarding
lack of concern of recent dollar weakness, ideas might heighten that perhaps a weaker
dollar is desired. Given the Trade data due out this week it may be of little surprise
that a weaker dollar may be greeted with silent approval. That is of course unless it
inhibits funding of the Current Account Deficit, which is 5.3% of GDP. Greenspan and many
market pundits (typically the same ones who coined the phrase new era to
describe the stock market bubble) believe the Current Account Deficit is transitory.
However, evidence from Capital Flows data show that financing is becoming more difficult
as short-term flows, rather than FDI and Portfolio, are being relied upon to bridge the
gap. Retail Sales will be the first major release on Thursday and are expected to come in
soft following weak auto sales and bad weather. Ex-Autos, Sales are expected to come in
flat, largely due to higher Gas prices and higher Food sales. The catch 22 is that higher
energy prices are actually reducing real disposable incomes that could easily lead to
continued weakness in Sales. All of this comes amid clear signs of Inventory building with
Business Inventories (as well as Whole Sales Inventories) seen rising in January. Thus, it
might be important to begin watching I/S ratios to gauge whether Inventory building is
voluntary or not! Inflation data this week will also be of interest given the sharp
rise seen last month in PPI. Once again, another sharp rise is the risk. However, the Core
PPI is seen flat, and mild on a YOY comparison, largely due to the fact that Auto prices
are seen weakening sharply. Another surprise this week could be the Industrial Production
data. Auto and Utility output are expected to have dropped sharply and the ISM Production
data, as well as week Manufacturing payrolls (very weak indeed) and sharply lower
Aggregate Hours Worked (-1.0%) heighten risk of a negative figure. The Preliminary
Michigan Sentiment is also seen weakening to a new low on war concerns, as well as poor
economic data, job losses, and weak equity prices. In sum the economic data is unlikely to
give the markets much to cheer about this week.
Technical Levels
The SPH contract once again bent, but could not break;
despite the fact it closed lower for the second straight week. The mid-Feb low, and year
low, of 805 stayed intact as prices put in the low of 809 on Friday. Prices turned up
sharply but stopped at 830 (return of the upward sloping down trend line that was broken
last week). Key support this week should be 825/819, and 809. Another challenge of 809 and
805 might not be the year low for long. Below is support at 790 and then the October level
of 767. Strong support, should we take out those lows, would come in at the 730 level
(.618 of the 1987 low to the 2000 high). Resistance this week should be seen at 830/32,
840, and 855 (.382% of the 936 to 805 down move this year). A held move above 830 could
set sights on the 853 level, which has stopped the past two short covering rallies cold in
its tracks and therefore is a significant level. Above is resistance at the December 31
low of 868 and then yearly settlement near 880. Above would set sights back near the
925/35 area. This is an equal opportunity market and has paid those who remained cognizant
of key levels, and disciplined to take appropriate action.
The USM made new contract highs again at 115-10 last week,
which is near the top of an upward sloping channel line. Profit taking set in which sent
prices back towards the 114-04/10 level. Resistance this week should be seen at
115-04/115-16/115-25, with major resistance at 116-00. Support should be seen at
114-16/10/114-00. Below 114-00 and the annual pivot of 112-20 (A) could come into focus.
The TYM saw a new contract high at 116-175 before profit taking set in. Resistance this
week should be seen at 116-10/16/24 with major resistance seen at 117-00. Support should
be seen at 116-00/115-24/115-16. Below 115-16 and sights could be set on 115-02 (Q) and
then trend line support near 114-00. The pivot for the week should center on the FVM
quarterly pivot of 113-30 (Q). In other words, cheaper indicates risk to aforementioned
support levels whereas richer indicates risk to resistance levels.
The treasury cash curve saw new cycle highs (low in yield)
of 2yr 1.35, 5yr 2.50, 10yr 3.54, and 30yr 4.60. Arguably, real yields are decisively
negative out to the 5yr sector! Pivotal levels to watch this week are quarterly pivots of
5yr 2.69 (Q), 10yr 3.70 (Q), and 30yr 4.86 (Q). Closes cheaper may warn of risk to higher
yield levels. The curve steepened to new cycle wide levels. Keys to further widening are
the ability to hold richer than 2/5/30 86 (A), 2/10/30 117 (S), and 10/30 105 (Q). Key
resistance to watch is 10/30 116 (Q), and 5/10/30 0 (A). Key support on flattening is 2/10
204 (S).
The EUR saw a new move high near 1.1060 Friday. The next
major resistance level comes in at 1.1160 (50% retracement level of the synthetic 1991
high to the 2000 low). Support should be 1.0970/40 and 1.0900. Below and trend line
support comes in at 1.0800. The $/Yen found support just beneath 117.00 and the key annual
pivot of 117.17 (A). A close cheaper would target a run toward the last July low of 115.42
and then the 113.00 level. Resistance should be seen at 118.50/119.00/119.40. Above is
potential to annual resistance of 121.55 (A). The EUR/YEN found support at the old
November high of 126.13 and then bounced sharply back to 129.00. Richer and there is
potential for a run back to the 131.00 level. This cross might still be the best way to
play the long EUR, as Japanese year-end repatriation nears an end.
Comment
Fed Chairman Greenspan said last week servicing big
Current Account deficits can be destabilizing. Growing capital flows may cause temporary
imbalances, not necessarily a sign of systemic problem. This was an interesting
thought coming from the Fed Chairman when the U.S. Current Account deficit is running at a
rate of over 5% of GDP, a record. His opinion is valued; however, it reminds me of his
comments during the stock mania about the new era!
There appears to be evidence mounting that the U.S. Current
Account shortfall might have implications that the market is not contemplating, given the
complacency over the willingness of foreigners to fund this gap. The complacency is rooted
in the thought that there is no where else for foreigners to go (very reminiscent of the
excuse to invest in stocks at the height of the bubble
where else is there to
put your money?). Recent evidence gathered from Capital Flows data shows foreigners
have found other choices. Specifically, during the month of December, the U.S.
was unable to meet this external obligation from portfolio flows of FDI flows (foreign
direct investment). Rather, the shortfall was met with short-term capital. Treasury and
Agency flows were the greatest, amounting to $88bn in the second half of the year whereas
they were 0 during the first half. Equity flows into the U.S. where virtually nil and U.S.
flows into foreign bonds were $5.4bn. Euroland, on the other hand, witnessed a Current
Account surplus of EUR 101bn vs. a deficit of EUR 61bn the previous year.
What this says is that short-term flows into treasury
securities were most likely a result of the risk aversion (flight to quality) given the
current geopolitical environment. Longer term, and more stable portfolio and FDI
flows have clearly shifted away from the U.S.. Referring back to last weeks comment,
the only kind of portfolio flows into the U.S. are coming from central banks, mostly from
Asia, in recycling of their trade surplus. Given the sharp dollar down turn, it is
questionable as to how long these CBs are willing to hold on to losses!
In sum, this external gap, coupled with the return of the
Twin Deficits could raise serious problems going forward. Therefore, the risk,
which is not at all being contemplated by market participants, is that foreign funding
dries up. The implications call for an even sharper dollar fall, which may carry with it
the need for the fed to raise interest rates to attract the badly needed capital.
Conversely, the other solution is for U.S. domestic savings to fund the gap, which carries
with it implications on GDP since consumption (the flip side of savings) is 2/3 of GDP and
therefore weaker economic growth. The savings issue was met during the 1990s by the
public sector as the U.S. ran a Budget Surplus. That is definitely not the case today and
highlights the danger of running massive Twin Deficits and the end to the
present comfortable interest rate environment (priced for perfection). |